Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct
MeasuredOn the same M3 Ultra (same quant and runtime family, chat-short), Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct decoded at 70.5 tok/s and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct at 168.3 tok/s, each model's fastest matched run on that hardware.
Signed, community-submitted decode tok/s, prefill, and TTFT for Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct vs DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct — every number links to the run it came from.
How to read these results
On the same M3 Ultra, Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct decoded at 70.5 tok/s and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct at 168.3 tok/s. Each row in the table is a like-for-like pair: the same hardware, quant and runtime family on the chat-short workload, using each side's fastest such run. Runs can still differ in host, runtime build and context. These are reference results, not a controlled speed or answer-quality ranking. Inspect both source runs before choosing hardware. 1 more hardware config was measured on both but not like-for-like; they are listed separately in the "Not a like-for-like pair" table below and left out of the comparison.
Hardware with data on both models
| Hardware | Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct decode | DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct decode | Δ | Source runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M3 Ultra (60-core GPU) | 70.51tok/s chat-short · mlx · 4BIT (from file name) | 168.3tok/s chat-short · mlx · 4BIT (from file name) | -97.8 | r_l36cijqxq4t · r_l_v1-zq_qaz |
Not a like-for-like pair
These have data on both sides, but the model size, quant or runtime differs, so they are not a head-to-head and are left out of the comparison above.
| Hardware | Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct decode | DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct decode | Why it isn't matched | Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTX 5090 (32GB) | 140.0tok/s llama.cpp · quant unreported | 309.5tok/s llama.cpp · quant unreported | quant unreported | r_opuj21f13-_ · r_0_gs1rgl2fl |
See also: Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct benchmarks · DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct benchmarks · All hardware · All models · Methodology
Request the missing runs
No measured run yet for these pairs. Vote for the one you want; the most-requested runs go first. See all requests.
We never sell or share your email. Privacy