Skip to content
llm-speed
Leaderboard/models/deepseek-v3

DeepSeek-V3

No benchmarks for DeepSeek-V3 yet.

No DeepSeek-V3 benchmarks yet.

Run on your hardware to populate this page: pipx install llm-speed && llm-speed bench

$ pipx install llm-speed && llm-speed bench

Community folklore

14 unverified claims extracted from Reddit/HN comments. Lower trust than signed runs above; every row links to the source.

  • communityconfidence 75%

    5.00tok/s — deepseek-V3 on Together AI via hosted-api FP4

    our signed data: Together AI · deepseek-V3

    “VRAM, higher vRAM might helpful for long-context, PCIe5 might helpful for prefill. DDR4 Epyc or Icelake-SP Xeons with GPU may only reach \~5t/s(from my deepseek-V3 experience), which is pretty slow. - Serious one: 4x RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell together with modern Xeon or Epyc shoul…”

    source: Reddit · u/lly0571 · 2025-09-22

  • communityconfidence 65%

    10.00tok/s — DeepSeek V3 on RTX 4090 FP8

    our signed data: RTX 4090 · DeepSeek V3

    “g fast. Expert weights on CPU (4-bit GGUF): All the huge MoE banks live in system RAM and load as needed. End result: I’m seeing about \~10 tokens/sec with a 32K context window—pretty smooth for local tinkering. KTransformers made it so easy with its Docker image. It handles …”

    source: Reddit · u/texasdude11 · 2025-04-27

  • communityconfidence 65%

    56.00tok/s — deepseek v3.2 via vllm FP16

    our signed data: deepseek v3.2

    “: With the vllm-gfx906-mobydick fork, you can also run smaller recent models (as the base is vllm v0.17.1) like **Qwen3.5 27B** (reaching **56 tok/s** at MTP5 and TP4 but it fits also on 1 MI50 32GB with 65k context; maybe later, if you are interested in, I can also make another …”

    source: Reddit · u/ai-infos · 2026-04-01

  • communityconfidence 60%

    25.00tok/s — DeepSeek V3 on H100 via vllm

    our signed data: H100 · DeepSeek V3

    “other developers, unlimited tokens Running DeepSeek V3 (685B) requires 8×H100 GPUs which is about $14k/month. Most developers only need 15-25 tok/s. sllm lets you join a cohort of developers sharing a dedicated node. You reserve a spot with your card, and nobody is charged until…”

    source: HN · u/jrandolf · 2026-04-04

  • communityconfidence 60%

    10.85tok/s — DeepSeek-V3.1 on RTX 5090 via llama.cpp

    our signed data: RTX 5090 · DeepSeek-V3.1

    “gh the system popping out through a small gap left by RTX 5090). DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus with context = 37279 tokens: PP = 151.76 tps, TG = 10.85 tps Some things I discovered running local LLMs: * For water-cooled CPU systems, there is not enough air circulation to cool the RAM…”

    source: Reddit · u/sloptimizer · 2026-01-23

  • communityconfidence 60%

    151.8tok/s — DeepSeek-V3.1 on RTX 5090 via llama.cpp

    our signed data: RTX 5090 · DeepSeek-V3.1

    “is threaded through the system popping out through a small gap left by RTX 5090). DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus with context = 37279 tokens: PP = 151.76 tps, TG = 10.85 tps Some things I discovered running local LLMs: * For water-cooled CPU systems, there is not enough air circulatio…”

    source: Reddit · u/sloptimizer · 2026-01-23

  • communityconfidence 60%

    10.00tok/s — DeepSeek V3 on RTX 4090 via llama.cpp

    our signed data: RTX 4090 · DeepSeek V3

    “nt=share_button) \- DeepSeek V3-0324 Q4\_K\_M with 512GB RAM DDR5 RAM 4800MHz and one RTX 4090; Prompt eval speed: 40 t/s; generation: \~10 t/s; DDR5 with 8 channels certainly improves the speed but it is not blazing fast. 3. If you have more VRAM, you can try --ubatch-size …”

    source: Reddit · u/MLDataScientist · 2025-06-01

  • communityconfidence 60%

    40.00tok/s — DeepSeek V3 on RTX 4090 via llama.cpp

    our signed data: RTX 4090 · DeepSeek V3

    “css&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button) \- DeepSeek V3-0324 Q4\_K\_M with 512GB RAM DDR5 RAM 4800MHz and one RTX 4090; Prompt eval speed: 40 t/s; generation: \~10 t/s; DDR5 with 8 channels certainly improves the speed but it is not blazing fast. 3. If you have more VRAM, yo…”

    source: Reddit · u/MLDataScientist · 2025-06-01

  • communityconfidence 55%

    10.00tok/s — Deepseek v3.2 via vllm AWQ

    our signed data: Deepseek v3.2

    “16x AMD MI50 32GB at 10 t/s (tg) & 2k t/s (pp) with Deepseek v3.2 (vllm-gfx906) Deepseek 3.2 AWQ 4bit @ 10 tok/s (output) // 2000 tok/s (input of 23k tok) on vllm-gfx906-deepseek with 69000 context length **Power draw**: 550W (idle) / 2400W (peak inf”

    source: Reddit · u/ai-infos · 2026-01-07

  • communityconfidence 55%

    27.64tok/s — DeepSeek V3 on RTX 5090 IQ4_XS

    our signed data: RTX 5090 · DeepSeek V3

    “at X16 5.0, 5090(2) at X4 5.0, all the rest at X4 4.0: 940 t/s PP, 26.75 t/s TG. * 5090s at X16 5.0, all the rest at X16 4.0: 1170 t/s PP, 27.64 t/s TG. **DeepSeek V3 0324, IQ4\_XS, offloading about 120GB to CPU:** Loading with: ./llama-server -m '/run/media/pancho/MyDrive…”

    source: Reddit · u/panchovix · 2026-01-16

See all 14 claims for DeepSeek-V3 →

Request a DeepSeek-V3 run

No measured run yet for these pairs. Vote for the one you want; the most-requested runs go first. See all requests.

0 votes

We never sell or share your email. Privacy

We can rent this card · Submit your own